Its protection capabilities meet the needs you demand on a secure licensing system. IntelliLock combines strong license security, highly adaptable licensing functionality/schema with reliable assembly protection. There is also a comprehensive support for the Compact Framework 2.0 and 3.5. Its flexible managed concept allows you full licensing integration into any existing system. This way single files can be produced without the need of additional files. IntelliLock opts a 100% managed way to apply licensing and protection features. NET Reactor does everything Intellilocks can do and with stronger protection.IntelliLock is an advanced 100% managed solution for licensing controls and applications. NET Reactor while not as user-friendly as Intellilocks. NET Reactor being stronger on the protection algorithm and with Intellilocks having an easier GUI but a weaker protection strength as compared with. NET Reactor and Intellilocks do more or less the same thing with.
Therefore it is a question of preference which tool to choose to NET Reactor injects native protection code. Of very flexible and advanced licensing features. To create assemblies which are still cross-platform compatible and use The managed nature of IntelliLock allows you String Encryption even without a restriction.Ī significant difference between both products is the 100% managed
Obfuscation/Control Flow Obfuscation/Inject Invalid MetaData and
NET Reactor but theĭifferences could be kept within a limit. IntelliLock is not as strong as the one from. License management support via an ASP.NET interface. Support for Linux (Mono) or the Compact Framework or offer full That is the reason why IntelliLock can even provide licensing Other side IntelliLock is 100% concentrated on licensing and theĬorresponding protection functionality is optimized for the licensing Protection without making a compromise to the licensing system. You only need one product.NET Reactor is 100% concentrated on I came into the same question and have the luck to have their Eziriz CTO replied:
0 kommentar(er)
